You're literally commenting on an article where Israel has sought and won peace with a neighbor. Whatever land was appropriated, was done so as a result of Arab aggression and Israel has repeatedly offered to give it back for peace. It has already done so repeatedly with other Arab neighbors. So yeah, you can definitely understand who is in the wrong here.
> Whatever land was appropriated, was done so as a result of Arab aggression
What part of "it's illegal to appropriate someone's land even after an aggression" you don't understand?
And it's illegal for a reason, not because the international community is evil. Also, what aggression specifically gave Israel permission to settle hundreds of thousands of people in the West Bank in the last 20 years?
> Israel has repeatedly offered to give it back for peace
Peace comes after Israel has returned what has misappropriated, not before. This seems pretty obvious to me. Even more obvious is that if Israel had any intention to give the land back in any foreseeable future, it wouldn't have built entire f.....g cities on it!
Seriously, I can't understand if you're trying to deceive only me or yourself too.
Really? Your objection to the fact that a country is not allowed to build cities on occupied territories is "are you saying Jews are not allowed to live there"?. Haha. Sorry, that is funny. Well, you know, it's not really about Jews...
Not "Jews" -- citizens of Israel. It is not allowed to transfer own population to occupied territory. It is an obligation Israel admitted by signing Geneva accords
