Why? Shouldn't it be "people who have a more positive impact on society should have more money"?
Being smart isn't anything, it's like being tall. You got it because you were born with it.
Also, what about those who weren't born "smart"? Should society just tell them "tough luck"? Shouldn't we think about everyone and how they will all do in our future, more perfect country/world?
Are you really suggesting that it’s not possible to cultivate intelligence in an age where even the lowest classes have instant access to the sum of human knowledge? You either agree that all men(humans) are born equal or you agree that some men(humans) have a right to rule. You can’t assert that everyone deserves equal rights while also asserting that some people are simply smarter by nature, obviously smarter people need to be making the decisions right? Or are we already at the point that we’re calling intelligence subjective
Why? Shouldn't it be "people who have a more positive impact on society should have more money"?
Being smart isn't anything, it's like being tall. You got it because you were born with it.
Also, what about those who weren't born "smart"? Should society just tell them "tough luck"? Shouldn't we think about everyone and how they will all do in our future, more perfect country/world?