> To be fair, most of that is them catching up to where Intel already was. Noone seems to actually be fabbing meaningfully smaller feature sizes (or higher layer counts) than what Intel is stagnating at.
Eh, Intel's 14nm is 37M transistors/mm2. TSMC and SS are both up to 52M/mm2 at 10nm, and 92M/mm2 at 7nm. Both Apple and AMD's latest gen stuff is on TSMC's 7nm process _today_. Yes, Intel's 10nm is at 101M/mm2, but until they can get mass production on that they're falling substantially behind.
If you look at long-term trends transistor density has kept pace (slowed down consistently but not dramatically along the years), the big difference is that it no longer gives you as much as a performance boost as it used to.
Eh, Intel's 14nm is 37M transistors/mm2. TSMC and SS are both up to 52M/mm2 at 10nm, and 92M/mm2 at 7nm. Both Apple and AMD's latest gen stuff is on TSMC's 7nm process _today_. Yes, Intel's 10nm is at 101M/mm2, but until they can get mass production on that they're falling substantially behind.