Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I'm becoming less and less bullish on automation. It may be stupid, but I think that a lot of commmon tasks are functionally un-automatable, or at least not at an acceptable level of error.

Think about something as simple as phone support for pretty much any product or service. There's a ton of automation being employed there to relatively little effect - just try to do anything meaningful at any company yourself and you'll find you need to be shunted to a representative.

I recently needed to switch my phone plan ownership from a personal account to a company account. There were a couple of wrinkles that made my case more complicated than normal which I can't share. Despite 4 or 5 calls, I couldn't get it done. It just didn't seem like the process for doing this type of transfer didn't exist in any codified way. I could explain what I wanted to do in plain language, but it wasn't a valid transition. Not only was it invalid, it seems like nobody at this major phone provider had ever planned for this scenario to happen.

Now imagine this scenario under full phone support automation. The system wouldn't even understand what I was trying to do. You could definitely argue that you could design some sort of scenario router that might handle a situation like this, but it seems unlikely that if they couldn't come up with a human process, I doubt they could swing an automated one.

Something like AGI could handle a problem like this, but it feels like we're dozens or maybe hundreds of years away from that.



> I couldn't get it done.

It's quite easy to automate that outcome.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: