Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

The iPhone did two amazing things:

1) it offered full web browser experience. No one had done this in a phone yet. They also banned flash from day 1 and favoured development using standard web technologies. The side benefit from all of this is that the data demands crippled our cellular networks and forced major infrastructure upgrades :)

2) Apple took control out of the carriers hands. By standardizing on the web, no more special+favoured applications! Just load a web page :)




That is completely false.

Apple didn’t standardize anything on the web, nor followed standards.

What Apple wanted (and achieved) was to push their App Store to control everything and get that 30% of sales on top.

Even to this day Safari does not support standards that other browsers do. And, of course, they don’t allow other browsers to run on iOS.


Your claim is false. When Apple made the decision to not allow Adobe Flash on iOS, there was no App Store. Apple did not allow third-party apps, and writing HTML5 was the only way for any third party to run anything on iOS.

That changed later, and clearly Apple enjoys the 30% now, but the grandparent comment is 100% accurate, and your first three sentences are 100% false.

The fourth statement is accurate, though!


The iOS App Store preceded the Flash ban.

"Apple introduced the App Store on July 10, 2008 with 500 apps" https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2018/07/app-store-turns-10/

Apple's Flash restrictions were published in draft form in April 2010. http://www.mikechambers.com/blog/2010/04/20/on-adobe-flash-c...

And justified by Steve Jobs that same month: https://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughts-on-flash/


This is cherry-picking articles to create a false timeline. The iPhone never supported Flash. There was never a "Flash ban" so much as there was never Flash.


I think that by "Flash ban" Dotnaught means "Apple's ban on third party development tools" which was specifically intended to ban the iOS packager tool Adobe had started shipping.


You talk as if "web apps" and "Apps" in general (in a phone) were a thing back then.

They were not. Apple was selling a browser in a phone which was a new concept for normal customers.

Blackberries were a thing back then and the iPhone killed them because of this.


All of the earlier smartphones had applications. I had a real player app and a better video recorder for my Symbian phone; blackberry, windows (CE), and palm phones all had apps too.

Mobile Safari was certainly a lot better than browsers on the other phones though. And a lack of carrier garbage and interference on updates was also nice.


You can get Firefox and Chrome for iOS...


No, you cannot. They are wrappers of Safari's engine.


Yes, but they're just thin wrappers around iOS' WebView; they don't use the Gecko or Blink engines. Apple doesn't allow other browser engines on the App Store.


Wasn't the iPhone in USA exclusive to one carrier for, like, a decade? Meanwhile in the rest of the world carriers never really had any power over how we used our devices or what was on them.


It was exclusive for AT&T from 2007 until 2011 I believe.


1) What about WindowsMobile, Blackberry?




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: