This is not a good argument. You have no legal right to drive an automobile or to fly a plane, both are heavily regulated. The "if you have a job that requires X" argument is fundamentally weak, there is no intrinsically superior right to any activity due to it being job related or not (this is a good thing, I believe).
The problem of course is the extent of intrusion on daily lives.
The better legal approach is the 10th amendment route, or coming up with new legislation.
The problem of course is the extent of intrusion on daily lives.
The better legal approach is the 10th amendment route, or coming up with new legislation.