Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Sometimes Apple will release a new version of a product and disappointment will follow. People will always point out some improvements, as there always will be, but sometimes there are just less changes than what people were expecting.

I think it's safe to say that the iPhone 4 and iPad 2 (the last big two releases for Apple) have been significant upgrades. Gruber agrees and so do many other analysts. Instead of feeling disappointed, I felt pleasantly surprised after the announcement - a feeling that I'm sure many other people shared.

Let's just say: Apple is definitely on a roll.




Apple's money generating machine is on a roll for sure. There's absolutely no reason why Apple couldn't have included most of those features in the initial iPad. I agree that the smart cover is completely genius (especially as a marketing scheme - and why doesn't anyone talk about protecting the rest of the iPad now? Somehow the screen is all of a sudden the only important thing?)

None of the new stuff is new technology. They're amazing at selling something that's good enough for a lot of uses and leaving a lot of space for improvement in the very near future. If they would've included cameras and the accelerometer in version 1, and perhaps made it a bit thinner, version 2 would've been significantly less interesting.


> None of the new stuff is new technology. They're amazing at selling something that's good enough for a lot of uses and leaving a lot of space for improvement in the very near future. If they would've included cameras and the accelerometer in version 1, and perhaps made it a bit thinner, version 2 would've been significantly less interesting.

Really?

I assume that you look back on every product's new version and say, "none of this is new tech, they could have shipped it in the last version!"

In almost every case, subsequent versions are driven directly by previous versions; nothing revolutionary happens. Was the dual core A5 ready for the first iPad? Was unibody aluminum manufacturing ready for the form factor and volume of iPad? Were the cameras sourced cheaply enough for the first iPad? What about 512MB RAM? Could all of this have been done in time for the first iPad? You have none of those answers, and I bet that most of them are "no."

Then you have something like the Smart Covers. Those are derived directly from watching what happened with the first iPad. No great cases came out, and people wanted to protect the screen. You ask, "Somehow the screen is all of a sudden the only important thing?" Well, yes, for many people. Myself included. I refuse to use any case, because most prevent easy docking, add bulk and are a pain. But every time I travel with my iPad, I am careful to stick it in a bag such that the screen is protected.


There's absolutely no reason why Apple couldn't have included most of those features in the initial iPad.

You know, that 's exactly what everyone says about software, which is why it's nearly always late and buggy. The temptation to add "just one more thing" absolutely kills products.

Please believe me when I tell you, Apple's magic is leaving stuff out. Not because they can make more money later, but because they are smart enough to ship a great product that works properly NOW rather than trying for a perfect product that is late and buggy later.


Not true. The reason ipad one hit the $499 price point (estimates were 800-1000 at the time) was because it left out extra expenses in order to preserve profit margin. One year goes by, things get cheaper, Steve throws a few bones, rinse and repeat next year.


on't forget that apart from the four people who used a Microsoft tablet, this is a new product category and most people are nervous around new technology. Less is more on that front, as they make users comfortable with the concepts in use.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: