Your response reads as though you're disagree with an assertion I didn't make. I almost feel like you read my post as saying that The Fifth Discipline is the -best- book on the topic. That I'm not saying, if for no other reason than because I haven't read every book on the topic.
However, I stand by the assertion that it is a worthy read. I gained a lot from reading it, and if it falls short of being totally comprehensive and standing entirely on its own... well, that's a criticism that would apply to many books.
All of that said, thanks for mentioning the Sterman book. I wasn't familiar with it, and I'm about to order a copy.
However, I stand by the assertion that it is a worthy read. I gained a lot from reading it, and if it falls short of being totally comprehensive and standing entirely on its own... well, that's a criticism that would apply to many books.
All of that said, thanks for mentioning the Sterman book. I wasn't familiar with it, and I'm about to order a copy.