They're probably hoping things will go back to normal fast enough that the cost of removing and reinstalling seats would outweigh the benefits.

Right, but only to configurations that have gotten FAA approval, right?

> only to configurations that have gotten FAA approval, right?

No, the FAA doesn't regulate seating layouts.

Weight and balance have to be met, and exit time is verified.

No, FAA doesn't deal with configurations. They have regs as to how to balance loads, but that's a hot-to rule, not something you need to get approved or they'd have to approve every single flight. Nothing is stopping Southwest from removign all their seats right now.

The thing is, the FAA and ESA are putting targets for evac times. These have to be adhered to. They are not looking at individual configs, just that evac times are kept and properly tested for.

FYI: In case you're not a pilot, I was being a little ironic about weight and balance.

Since people are heavier today, and carrying unweighed baggage into the cabin, weight and balance are actually not being met.

They're blocking off the last 2 rows on the A320neo because of this: https://www.forbes.com/sites/heatherfarmbrough/2019/09/19/wh...

I'm a commercially-rated airplane pilot. I tolerate the pedantic HN comments, but please realize that I know what I'm talking about, and if you're not a pilot, you don't.

In your mind, if there was only a single rule that seats have to be red, would that count as only allowing "approved configurations"? They have to meet a couple simple measurements, but they can do anything at all inside that constraint, putting seats anywhere they want with nothing stopping them. "approved configurations" just isn't accurate.