Not to mention a better baseline immunity within the population, and more preparedness as a whole.
Testing kit shortages, lack of information, no vaccine, etc. are all a function of how little time we've had to respond. If we can buy 3 months, that's a lot of bonus time to prepare.
I think this thing is so contagious that all the weak people will already be dead.
The second wave might kill a few of the survivors that had their immune system weakened since the first wave, but it shouldn't be as much people as the first time.
I think that's likely, but it's understandably difficult to convince anyone to spend a few hundred million dollars to develop vaccine that might never be used.
Seems like a pretty good deal right now. Our economic system has structural pathologies that make it extremely difficult to meaningfully organize whole populations.
Yeah, ok, I think I agree with this. I have to believe that a sustained effort to develop coronavirus vaccines would bear fruit, whether actual vaccines or merely processes and knowledge, even if the particular motivating disease was no longer in circulation.
It can and will. For that matter, it's an RNA virus that is morphing as a function of the error factor of replication, so vaccines may be ineffective (for the same reason we continue to get the "common cold" again and again over our lives, as well as the flu -- the signature keeps changing).
We will see.
Though it's worth noting that there are a lot of very contrary signals on whether it attenuates with heat. Some find that it doesn't, while some do. The very origin of this -- Wuhan -- had very temperate conditions when the outbreak began, and transmission seems to be much worse in the US than in Canada.