Maybe. Java is quite fast, but for very different reasons than APL; I don't thin... | Hacker News

Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit

login

earenndil on Feb 4, 2020 | parent | context | favorite | on: April: An APL That Compiles to Common Lisp

Maybe. Java is quite fast, but for very different reasons than APL; I don't think it would transfer that easily. Part of the reason APLs are so fast is because the interpreter and all the code fit in cache; my copy of k is 76kb. I don't think there's a chance you could get that with the jvm. APL also relies heavily on SIMD, and I don't know how well-supported that is on the JVM.

gmfawcett on Feb 4, 2020 [–]

Granted, those are fair points. My copy of J is 42KB, so I understand where you're coming from. :)

There's some support for vectorization in the JVM, e.g. [1, 2], but I suspect it's hit-or-miss.

[1] https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=6340864

[2] https://bugs.java.com/bugdatabase/view_bug.do?bug_id=7192383

Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.
Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact