You might not want to go through the 1h30 rant from Richard Lewis, so feel free to skip to 31:00 and 34:30 for the content of the original article.
I really don't know what to make of this. I just can't imagine what would prompt people to write and then actually publish this.
You can read the comments on the article [2], there is no errata on the article and I haven't seen any official response from the Washington Post.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fay_X1Cu9Uc
[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/abu-bakr-al-...
Edit: Actually there is an official response, at 39:20, a tweet (sigh) which might be even more scandalous than that headline
You might not want to go through the 1h30 rant from Richard Lewis, so feel free to skip to 31:00 and 34:30 for the content of the original article.
I really don't know what to make of this. I just can't imagine what would prompt people to write and then actually publish this.
You can read the comments on the article [2], there is no errata on the article and I haven't seen any official response from the Washington Post.
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Fay_X1Cu9Uc
[2] https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/obituaries/abu-bakr-al-...
Edit: Actually there is an official response, at 39:20, a tweet (sigh) which might be even more scandalous than that headline