Except when those dissenting voices make credible threats to your person, family, and livelihood or libel and slander you at a volume that is infeasible to litigate.
> I little sympathy for people getting upset at being deplatformed - they can go elsewhere
Where can they go when all of the major social media companies share the same general ideology? This idea that social media networks are plug-and-play beggars belief. Or perhaps you simply meant that people who don't adhere to this ideology simply don't deserve to participate in social media; that it's a privilege and not a right?
> their cries of freedom of expression cry wolf to the constitutional issue of those in power doing actual oppression.
Except when those dissenting voices make credible threats to your person, family, and livelihood or libel and slander you at a volume that is infeasible to litigate.
> I little sympathy for people getting upset at being deplatformed - they can go elsewhere
Where can they go when all of the major social media companies share the same general ideology? This idea that social media networks are plug-and-play beggars belief. Or perhaps you simply meant that people who don't adhere to this ideology simply don't deserve to participate in social media; that it's a privilege and not a right?
> their cries of freedom of expression cry wolf to the constitutional issue of those in power doing actual oppression.
What does this even mean?