Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> Some bizarre hair-splitting here.

I was trying to be explicit as to my reasoning. If that came across as "hair-splitting" then I suppose I failed to adequately do so.

The whole point I was trying to make is that people find code in all sorts of ways. And my opinion is that if a public repo, such as GitHub, has a project which could easily be both desired (due to need) and misused (due to intent), then it might be a good idea to put a simple declaration in the project's README.

Given all the blow-back this concept has incurred, I would think the concept is either wholly immaterial or now proven as needed.




Relevant username?

This seems to be a strange hill to die on. For all intents and purposes there is a declaration in the readme. And anyone who knows enough to want to operate with this will see that it's fairly basic. Others will likely just reach for a more generic or battle tested solution.

In any case, people should be able to do what they want with their repos and code, assuming legality of course.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: