Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

"To me, it's more about no longer needing to think about memory as a scarce resource, something you allocate carefully and manage with great care."

Once your data set doesn't fit in memory, it is indeed a scarce resource. And 24 GB is really not very much data.




Some people say: "but the computers become faster every year," to which I respond: "but the amount of data we throw at them grows every year at a similar rate."

There will never be a substitute for good algorithms. In my field (bioinformatics), thanks to next-gen sequencing technology, the data growth actually outpaces Moore's law. I imagine the same is true for data collected from social networks.


You have reminded me of that old line: "What Andy giveth, Bill taketh away."

(Referring to Andy Grove of Intel CEO fame 87-98, still there in some capacity, and Bill Gates.)


It depends. There are still corporations making real money that could fit all their essential data on one such machine.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: