I'm somewhat surprised there's zero articles about the latest supposed P?=NP proof by Romanov. Not that I believe it to be correct, but I would expect some people to at least casually review it.
Not really. Why should you 'casually' review it? It still takes about as much time and effort to 'casually' review something and come to a conclusion about it that you're willing to write about and stamp your name on, as it does to do it 'properly'.
Here's a post by Scott Aaronson from the last time something like this happened.
http://wiki.henryfarrell.net/wiki/index.php/Mathematics/Stat...