Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Much of the administrative stuff insurers do to prevent healthcare providers from doing unnecessary stuff. In a taxpayer funded system, there would still have to be an entity to double check healthcare providers’ billing.


Such an entity already exists. They're substantially more efficient at it.

https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20110920.01339...

> According to the Kaiser Family Foundation, administrative costs in Medicare are only about 2 percent of operating expenditures. Defenders of the insurance industry estimate administrative costs as 17 percent of revenue.


Yes, I agree. I don’t see why Medicare should only apply to those 65+. But until it applies to everyone, insurance companies have to serve that purpose. I worded it confusingly, but I meant to imply that insurance companies’ work is not all waste, since they’re doing a task that someone has to do, even if all healthcare was taxpayer funded.


That’s government. We all know that private companies are always more efficient. Right?




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: