Their primary presentation is the 0-5 star rating which is perfectly intuitive.
If I'm reading the methodology correctly, the actual STAR score represents the incidence of concussion, in which lower is certainly better.
The only real confusing thing I see is the "star" naming of the "STAR evaluation score" vs. using a "star rating" (0-5) and how they are actually separate things.
If I'm reading the methodology correctly, the actual STAR score represents the incidence of concussion, in which lower is certainly better.
The only real confusing thing I see is the "star" naming of the "STAR evaluation score" vs. using a "star rating" (0-5) and how they are actually separate things.