> Every large enterprise I've worked at in the last say 10 years, has software deployed across multiple dev stacks, with .Net being just one.
Re-read his comment. And be less angry. He wasn't saying that he worked on cross-platform .NET projects 10 years ago, just that big companies generally had/still have .NET projects, besides other tech stacks.
Are you possibly angry? Honestly, I feel very relaxed right now and I wish I could post a photo here to reassure you that I'm anything but angry :)
Anyways, my initial point was that .NET folks are less likely to look outside the MS bubble when making technology choices.
The other commentator said that he/she worked at large enterprises which had .NET teams and other development teams employed. That is great, but I don't see how that is relevant to my initial comment, because the question still stands if those .NET teams within those large organisations worked mostly within the MS stack or not.
My second comment was aimed at suggesting that I think it must have been the latter, given that before .NET Core many tech choices were forced upon those developers due to .NET being very tightly coupled to MS technologies.
So I take your point that large organisations might have many different dev teams, but that doesn't really say much about my point, which I still think can be true at the same time.
Re-read his comment. And be less angry. He wasn't saying that he worked on cross-platform .NET projects 10 years ago, just that big companies generally had/still have .NET projects, besides other tech stacks.