The comment that this post is referring to seems to be more thorough than the blog post seems to imply on my first read through.
I understand the issue, of what sounds like removing the core/theme signing, due to other issues like 32bit performance issues it seems, but it looks like the WP comment has plausible reasons for why.
It would be nice and more informative if the blog post took a point by point approach to the WP comment, IMO.
I understand the issue, of what sounds like removing the core/theme signing, due to other issues like 32bit performance issues it seems, but it looks like the WP comment has plausible reasons for why.
It would be nice and more informative if the blog post took a point by point approach to the WP comment, IMO.