Nobody is forcing you to use FB or Google, and I have all their domains null routed at my firewall.
However, you do not get to use the government to force your preferred terms of doing business on them. That is the definition of authoritarian. It's akin to nationalizing a company's valuable assets.
Even China was able to just ban them (i.e. choose not to do business with them), and try to steal their tech instead. The US government will not stand for this intellectual property theft, even if it's done through legislation.
The US government has investigated things like Russian activity on social media and the media refers to it as "hacking the election". There was a whole Cambridge Analytica scandal about it.
If the dismissive view of "nobody forced those people to use social media" and "the government should not force preferred terms" arguments were generally favored then none of those incidents would have been treated the way they were.
It is already the mainstream view that that the US government play some role in "securing elections", which means ensuring that social media platforms are not "taken advantage of" by biased interests as they allegedly were in 2016.
You honestly do not have any knowledge of the Federalist Papers (they represent arguments supporting the Constitution), nor the Constitution itself.
I do not think you have the courage to make these claims in Denver, nor Farmington, NM. I will say what I'm saying IRL in either place (which is why I'm within HN guidelines). I'll pay for your ticket and pick you up at the ABQ (or DEN airport, with enough notice). America is about liberty, not race or anything else, We have the smartest and most ambitious people from around the world, from all countries. We do not care about "blood and soil" people.
However, you do not get to use the government to force your preferred terms of doing business on them. That is the definition of authoritarian. It's akin to nationalizing a company's valuable assets.
Even China was able to just ban them (i.e. choose not to do business with them), and try to steal their tech instead. The US government will not stand for this intellectual property theft, even if it's done through legislation.