There's no reason to think that the laws of physics are "perfectly" tuned for consciousness. This could be the universe where there's a trillion-to-one shot of its evolving, and we beat the odds.
The Anthropic Principle rightly points out that the question of "why does the universe support life" is fundamentally circular.
Who is suggesting that consciousness is completely dependent on having "the laws of physics perfectly tuned"? Obviously there are other conditions outside the scope of just physics that must be met to foster life
The Anthropic Principle rightly points out that the question of "why does the universe support life" is fundamentally circular.