Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

> I don't buy this "emergent property of the mind" thing because while I understand evolutionary theory I am not sure how you bridge that gap to subjective experience.

So you don't know, or aren't aware of any existing scientific theory, therefore it's magic?

The attention schema theory: a mechanistic account of subjective awareness, https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.0050...




> So you don't know, or aren't aware of any existing scientific theory, therefore it's magic?

Possibly magic, would depend on your definition of "magic".

It's odd to see tech-minded people comment on this, because for us, every 0 and 1 is controllable and we hopefully get the expected output.

And here we are commenting on this "thing" that we clearly understand because X, Y, and Z study that affirms our beliefs says it's so.

I digress.

And don't get me started on solipsism. In that case, I'm not real and this comment is, because it has to be.


> And here we are commenting on this "thing" that we clearly understand because X, Y, and Z study that affirms our beliefs says it's so.

No one is claiming to understand. In fact the whole point of the article is about how much we don't understand the problem.


I think the biggest question from all of this, including the fascinating comments on this thread, why is Elon Musk and OpenAI talking about the singularity at this moment in time? We aren't there, we don't have anyway of knowing when or if we'll ever be there. One thing that is real, AI is buzzing with excitement but nobody knows why.


What gave you the ability to logic all of this out?

Don't take that as flippant.

Laws do not create laws.

Want a brainfuck? Sorry for the language. Prove to me that I did not create you.


I can't prove that you didn't create me. Where are you going with this?


How are you able to post this comment ... take it from the start, the real deal start.

No laws of physics, no time ... nada.

Now you get to post on HN ... and you have the hubris to state "because, science" ... seriously ...

Science has been given to you ... from where, exactly?


And your claim is that consciousness is responsible for science, computers, existence...? I think you need to reread those books on atheism. Pay particular attention to the god of the gaps argument.


The God of Gaps doesn't explain me.

Or you.




Consider applying for YC's Spring batch! Applications are open till Feb 11.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: