Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

In the interaction between FFI, GC, and hash tables, so yes, in the FFI itself, not in particular bindings:

https://github.com/racket/racket/issues/2702

https://github.com/racket/racket/issues/2263

There were workarounds (in Racket you can instruct the GC not to move your FFI objects) and I believe the underlying issues have been fixed.

I must add that I got immediate and comprehensive support from the core developers, who not only fixed the bug but also suggested the workaround (so I could continue to support all our target versions of Racket).




Thank you for your great bug report on this, and I'm glad to see it was in good hands.




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: