Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think most would agree that ‘surveillance’ for increasing odds of healthy outcomes is significantly different than surveillance used to make a buck.

Would you object to blood pressure and heart surveillance if you were in the hospital?




It's still surveillance, which is the point. Making a broad statement about surveillance is ridiculous, particularly when it is made in the same breath as a statement about advertising (which is a much less nuanced situation).




Join us for AI Startup School this June 16-17 in San Francisco!

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: