I think the fact that it comes with a mercurial CEO with discipline issues subtracts quite a bit from a potential acquirer's price.
Think about it - if you were considering buying the firm, what odds would you put on your first board meeting after being all about whatever the hell Musk got up to last week?
In the case of Apple, Tim Cook has spent quite a while working with Steve Jobs so he's no stranger to collaborating with a loose canon and could probably handle Musk pretty well.
I seem to recall that Steve was more involved with the Mac than the Lisa.
Also, in the context of the current discussion, the Steve that Tim Cook worked with was not young, reckless Steve, but an older and somewhat more mellow and responsible Steve.
The difference is Jobs' obsession was limited to consumer electronics, more or less, and he pushed the company to focus heavily on a very limited range of products.
Musk on the other hand will talk about cars one day, then solar energy the next, then the Hyerloop, then landing on Mars and making toy flamethrowers. The fit could not be more wrong.
Apple's acquired properties are quietly extinguished and replaced with Apple branding. Musk wouldn't have the temperament to play second fiddle to anybody else.
>Apple's acquired properties are quietly extinguished and replaced with Apple branding. Musk wouldn't have the temperament to play second fiddle to anybody else.
Beats as a brand is still around and producing new products.
A Steve Jobs that had spent some time in the wilderness away from Apple to mature and grow. Musk is probably more similar to Jobs before he left Apple the first time.
Think about it - if you were considering buying the firm, what odds would you put on your first board meeting after being all about whatever the hell Musk got up to last week?