I knew the term and I didn't find the comment particularly rude, even if I don't agree with it fully.
I agree that the docs could have been improved by providing some sort of definition. But I think something as simple as a link to wikipedia could have been enough.
I also agree that the intended target audience will most likely already be aware of immediate vs retained. Adding the aforementioned link would not have hurt said audience anyway.
I agree that the docs could have been improved by providing some sort of definition. But I think something as simple as a link to wikipedia could have been enough.
I also agree that the intended target audience will most likely already be aware of immediate vs retained. Adding the aforementioned link would not have hurt said audience anyway.