Right, taken in the context of just this interview, it is not that bad, it's just a guy saying I want extraordinary people and "claims" that he is willing to compensate them for being extraordinary. Standing by itself there is nothing wrong with it. But when you contrast that, with the buzz that went around a few months ago because someone job hopped him because they did not like the environment it tells a totally different story. There is a significant sense of entitlement in that exchange whereas this on seems to contradict his position, in this he pretty much states if you don't like it you are free to leave. But it would seem that he feels it is actually, if I don't like you, you I am free to protect my interests.