> People are generally more forgiving when you perceive your employees' disability in a positive light instead of viewing their disabilities as something to exploit.
Is that what this is?
I guess it's no more exploitative than employing anyone else.
> I guess it's no more exploitative than employing anyone else.
I think it’s way more exploitative because you’re not leveraging a person’s (by average definition) “strengths” to your/the company’s benefits, you’re using their weaknesses (and weaknesses are relative, but I’d say the list of traits above most people will probably think might complicate or hinder the persons long term success or happiness - in fact it could easily lead to one sided exploitation).
Not necessarily. Like anything it could be good or bad in certain situations. I interpret it as meaning the person will be driven to do what's right according to logic and merit as opposed to politics. It's another way of saying they are a disagreeable employee which are known to be very valuable to companies.
"Office politics" is a euphemism for anti-social behavior as I see it.
And, an office "without politics" with more than two persons maybe doesn't exist, but there is certainly more "office politics" in Paradise Hotel than in my office, so it's not like anyone that stays out becomes a pawn in some scheme.
Is that what this is?
I guess it's no more exploitative than employing anyone else.