Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Conversely, this assumes one can get hired at a startup with a high position and equity to match fang comp, which is not true for many.


It's not true for almost anyone.

Conversely, if you can get hired to a unicorn in a position that's senior enough to have any hope of coming anywhere near top tech pay, then you are likely talented enough to work at top tech instead.


Not necessarily, as talents at that level which are valued in top tech may be different than talents at that level that are valued at growing startups.

There a variety of companies that pay top dollar for talent, straddling early stage startups all the way through established companies. That doesn't mean it's easy to get those jobs. It does mean that you should apply your talents where it fits.

BTW, you don't need to be at a unicorn to earn top EV. 1% of a 100M exit is 1M, which is more than the vast majority of equity grants I've heard of from FANG. Many people put 0 value on startup equity. Those people decrease their lifetime EV through misconceptions of statistics.


> Not necessarily, as talents at that level which are valued in top tech may be different than talents at that level that are valued at growing startups.

I worked at both. Talent overlap is quite high, far higher than is commonly assumed.

> There a variety of companies that pay top dollar for talent, straddling early stage startups all the way through established companies.

I worked in startups for many years, and most of my friends still in the field are either founders or C-level execs. They are fully aware of the top compensation for top engineers in startups presently. Startups don't match top tech comp currently. Unless you factor in the options as a sure thing, and the startup ends up exiting at unicorn levels.

> Many people put 0 value on startup equity. Those people decrease their lifetime EV through misconceptions of statistics.

This is a reflection of how many people have spent precious years of their career working for startups, and generally seeing 0 return on these options.

It's also a reflection of the perceived lack of control over this sort of deferred compensation, and various nasty dynamics that often snatch value away from rank-and-file employees, even at the last minute or past it. See the LinkedIn exit and their infamous clawback policy.

Startup options have earned this reputation for 0 value over a decade of overhype and underperformance. Far too many talented people were promised the sky and ended up with nothing after years of hard work.


Got a link about the LinkedIn clawback? I hadn’t heard of this and google is not turning anything up. Has it been whitewashed?





Consider applying for YC's Winter 2026 batch! Applications are open till Nov 10

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: