That's not what I said at all. They are intentionally trying to prevent employers from abusing employees by forcing them into contracting arrangements with fewer benefits.
Trying one thing, not achieving that one, but achieving another bad thing in the process. How is that not failing ?
Upwork has been in the news more than enough to make it VERY clear that if there's any kind of organisation that needs to be prevented from exploiting others, it's Upwork.
Is that supposed to be better, or worse ? They're some combination of incompetence and malevolence. I feel like incompetence is worse.