Ace/ACE is maybe the most overused name or acronym out there. There are over a dozen entries in the Wikipedia disambiguation page in the computing subsection alone. And that doesn't count other domains and non-public projects.
I recently tried to embed Monaco but wound up with Ace instead due to issues using Monaco via requirejs. Was pleasantly surprised that Ace had all of the features we needed.
I tried to type in the snippet embedded in that page with Firefox Android. The cursor is about where I touched the screen but characters appear at the end of the line. The two locations move in sync when I use the arrow keys on my mobile keyboard.
That doesn't happen with the Etherpad editor. The demo at http://etherpad.org/ works well.
Are there any good opensource WYSIWYG/drag and drop website builders? I've always been curious if folks like leadpages, wix, etc build their own from scratch or start with something off the shelf.
Ace is probably the fastest code editor, especially for large files. Features are far from monaco but you have to load only 200kb for ace vs 2.5mb for monaco
Maybe it would make more sense to integrate those Editors then directly into the browser. Make it customizable and just create an API that can be used by some WebExtension, and deliver one out of the box. But at the end, a well adapted fast loading editor which is well integrated into the rest of the ecosystem might be some kind of next level for the Webstack-Platform.
This would be too much added complexity for such a limited use case. Browsers are already approaching the complexity of an operating system and starting to bundle applications in them sounds like a weird thing to do when even operating systems are moving away from bundling.
A PWA erases the cost of downloading the JS library, so that startup of the app would be the same as relying on having the same library bundled with the browser.
As far as latency goes, browsers won't beat what is already possible in HTML/CSS; or else, they can optimize the engine to match the performance and everyone benefits. That's why browsers' devtool editors are unsurprisingly in HTML/CSS (I believe Chrome/Firefox uses CodeMirror rather than Ace, but it works similarly).
Finally, functionality varies from one app to the other. One may want tabs to autocomplete; another may want them to input actual tabs; another, a number of spaces. Some may need multiple cursors, and some may need the editor's algorithms to not be too slow when the data to edit is compiled text (say, a single-line 100k minified JS file can crush the performance of your text editor if its string data structure is not ready).
There are no outstanding benefits to having a library be bundled in the browser.
Has the same problem like other web code editors. It does something weird with text selection and mouse click handling, so copy pasting using middle click doesn't work (in or out of the editor).
What's the use-case for an editor embedded in a webpage? It doesn't seem to be able to live-edit the webpage code - so I guess I don't really get it..
It'd be nice is someone made a general text editor that was also embeddedable and could also live edit itself (or the program it's running in). The closest I've seen is Nightlight
https://sekao.net/nightlight/
But it's not really "general purpose" like Emacs w/ Elisp and it's pretty Clojure specific
Long time reader here, I decided to create an account to reply to this.
We recently created a web interface for docker swarm as part of a university project, part of our requirements were that a compose file could be submitted via the web interface to create a new stack. We used ace for this and it worked quite nicely.
I maintain a code beautifier and parser. I use Ace to allow users to better read and understand their code as they use the features of my software. I also ensure that Ace is optional and can be turned off.
> ACE2 is EtherPad's editor, a content-editable-based rich text editor that supports IE6+, FF(2?/)3+, Safari(3?/)4+. It supports collaborative editing using operation transforms (easysync2), undo/redo, copy/paste.
> The name "ACE2" is because this is a rewrite of aiba's original content-editable AppJet Code Editor.
I've created a few systems that had web code editors on them. One was a CMS based on C# MVC Razor, the users were technical themselves so editing HTML and some light C# was better for them than a WYSIWYG editor. Another was a data ingest pipeline system that allowed customization of stages via Javascript. The scripts were stored in a database and edited via a web page (again, it was a technical audience and very small scripts so a web editor made sense).
c9's online editor hasn't been updated for years, c9 team decided it would no longer open source their platform like they used to, ultimately not benefiting from potential volunteer's work who could have made c9 editor better. The proof of it is their online editor is stuck with an old Go version and doesn't even support Typescript, while some other online IDE just use Monaco, which is open source and better than Ace.
Can't you embed a REPL?
Seems like REPL.it will be the de-facto standard for most cases in the near future? Maybe it's too heavy for some applications? Why would you use anything other than REPL?
Ace/ACE is maybe the most overused name or acronym out there. There are over a dozen entries in the Wikipedia disambiguation page in the computing subsection alone. And that doesn't count other domains and non-public projects.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ace_(disambiguation)