> I'm not sure what is the point of the first paragraph but it's considered full employment at 5% because not everyone is interested in having a job. It is impossible to have 100% employment rate. So there's no point in pursuing it.
People not looking for a job aren't included in that 5%, to be considered unemployed you have to be working less than 2 hours a week and looking for work.
More importantly that figure doesn't include the underemployed, those working at least 2 hours but looking for more.
People not looking for a job aren't included in that 5%, to be considered unemployed you have to be working less than 2 hours a week and looking for work.
More importantly that figure doesn't include the underemployed, those working at least 2 hours but looking for more.