> The parent comment was edited so of course there's no way you could have known, but it had previously equated the WSJ to being no better than "fake news."
I didn't realize he said WSJ is fake news. That is a bit hyperbolic but that's his opinion and he's certainly entitled to it.
> In this age of misinformation, I think it's important to support and recognize quality sources of information and education
In the age of misinformation, it is more critical that we hold a light to established news sources. Especially those that people blindly accept on faith.
> Comparing the WSJ to a fake news publication is disrespectful and ignorant and I think it's worth calling out.
So what if it was disrespectful? That's his opinion. Why attack him for it? Should he attack you for blindly accepting the WSJ?
WSJ is just a company. Why are you so offended? There's plenty the WSJ did for people to disrespect it. Obviously there's plenty they did for you to respect it. Whatever happened to respecting each other opinions?
You can disagree with him without calling him ignorant and attacking the guy.
I didn't realize he said WSJ is fake news. That is a bit hyperbolic but that's his opinion and he's certainly entitled to it.
> In this age of misinformation, I think it's important to support and recognize quality sources of information and education
In the age of misinformation, it is more critical that we hold a light to established news sources. Especially those that people blindly accept on faith.
> Comparing the WSJ to a fake news publication is disrespectful and ignorant and I think it's worth calling out.
So what if it was disrespectful? That's his opinion. Why attack him for it? Should he attack you for blindly accepting the WSJ?
WSJ is just a company. Why are you so offended? There's plenty the WSJ did for people to disrespect it. Obviously there's plenty they did for you to respect it. Whatever happened to respecting each other opinions?
You can disagree with him without calling him ignorant and attacking the guy.