Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

anecdotal evidence is not very useful.

Which is probably why the article mentioned a study that examined the link between access to video games and academic performance?




Sorry, I was mostly referring to the parent comment and not the article. Inreference, to the article though... The bit about the study doesn't really have much meat.

"Boys with video games at home, he found, spend more time playing them than reading, and their academic performance suffers substantially. Hard to believe, isn't it, but Science has spoken."

There is a lot left unexplored here. Was the problem the video games or the fact that they didn't read? Reading vs playing video games is a false dichotomy. They aren't mutually exclusive and the problem probably just indicates parents aren't taking an active roll and doing the sorts of things other commenters are suggesting.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: