Does anyone else find these two quotes a bit hard to stomach?
> Although toxicological specimens were not collected from the vehicle operator, responding officers from the Tempe Police Department stated that the vehicle operator showed no signs of impairment at the time of the crash.
> Toxicology test results for the pedestrian were positive for methamphetamine and marijuana.
So they tested the victim for drugs but not the Uber employee in the car??
Other than that, Uber's so-called "self-driving" system sounds like crap and should never have been allowed to be used in that state.
The test is probably a routine part of an autopsy, whereas it likely wasn’t a routine part of the police response (which use visual and verbal cues to preliminarily assess inebriation).
> Although toxicological specimens were not collected from the vehicle operator, responding officers from the Tempe Police Department stated that the vehicle operator showed no signs of impairment at the time of the crash.
> Toxicology test results for the pedestrian were positive for methamphetamine and marijuana.
So they tested the victim for drugs but not the Uber employee in the car??
Other than that, Uber's so-called "self-driving" system sounds like crap and should never have been allowed to be used in that state.