Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

NYC has rent controls, which themselves actually limit the quantity supplied. Arguably, AirBnB provides for a more efficient resource allocation since it allows the unit's price to float to the market equilibrium.


It's a different equilibrium though, where tourists are paying daily rates instead of locals paying monthly


So? Are tourist utility-hours somehow different from resident utility-hours?


Uh, yes? Clearly?

If I'm on vacation, I'm not looking to save every single dime because I know that it's a one-off expense.

If I'm looking for an apartment, I'll actively research to find the best deal because it's a long term commitment that could have huge ramifications on my finances years in the future.

Case in point:

I'd gladly pay $250 a night in a Manhattan hotel, because fuck it, I'm going on vacation, will only be there a few days, and don't want to spend an hour each day on the train getting to/from Newark just to save a couple hundred bucks.

But I would have to be crazy to pay $250 a night for an equivalent (i.e. studio) apartment in Manhattan, regardless of how much time it cuts off of my commute.


Residents provide stability to a polity's long term tax base, and are also the source of votes that politicians of said polity need to get re-elected. So, unless you want wild, cyclical swings in your polity's finances, long-term is generally a better bet.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: