This is the huge problem we are still facing with computer crime; because the law is still quite vague and unresolved. Juries have a tendency to not really "get" what has happened and so figure it's not all that bad etc.
It seems rotten but the best chance you would have with this is in getting the Jury excited about the stalking aspect and the contact with children.
Technically he has broken the law (at least, I think he has). Proving it though, along with mens rea (intent) is an absolute minefield and it would be torn apart by a decent lawyer. This is why most computer criminals are currently prosecuted for other crimes (in this case, probably the stalking offences).
That might be problematic but there is no indication at all that google did anything to even contact the justice department, let alone that they filed charges.
This is the huge problem we are still facing with computer crime; because the law is still quite vague and unresolved. Juries have a tendency to not really "get" what has happened and so figure it's not all that bad etc.
It seems rotten but the best chance you would have with this is in getting the Jury excited about the stalking aspect and the contact with children.
Technically he has broken the law (at least, I think he has). Proving it though, along with mens rea (intent) is an absolute minefield and it would be torn apart by a decent lawyer. This is why most computer criminals are currently prosecuted for other crimes (in this case, probably the stalking offences).