HN has a very high almostSignal-to-Nosie ratio. By that I mean that it has a lot of stuff that looks almost like something very important, but it's just not directly applicable to me at the moment. Kind of like talking to a really super smart interesting person -- but only about stuff they'd like to talk about. It's great to be here, but information is engaging and scattered all over the spectrum. I would say it's like drinking from a fire hose, but a fire hose goes in one direction. This is more being a great swimmer and jumping in a raging ocean. Lots of stuff to enjoy and keep you busy.
Because of this, I'm writing my own app for processing the web. A "browser for the easily engaged". It pulls the articles from all the major tech sites, including ranking, then it pulls the target articles. It learns what I like and don't like by doing Bayesian filtering on the client-side. Sort of a meta meta tech news app.
After all, how would a hacker consume news, if not by hacking it?
It learns what I like and don't like by doing Bayesian filtering on the client-side.
As a fellow geek, I like this idea but I've checked out similar systems over the years and found I could never fully get on board.. why? Because I ended up checking the source anyway to make sure I didn't miss anything that I might find interesting but that the filter filtered out anyway.
I can trust filtering for e-mail, since it wipes out non-content (usually). But filtering out content I "might not like" is tricky - I learn more about the world by being exposed to things I don't (initially) appreciate so I like to see a little noise in the mix. HN provides a sort of filtered noise that strikes just the right balance for me.
Yep I'm right there with you. I agree with everything you say.
So instead of filtering, I'm starting with Bayesian ranking. I agree about the pop-back-over thing too, but I wonder why? I'm really curious to see why I would pop back over to the regular site. As I identify these reasons, I can decide whether or not these are good reasons or not.
Basically I'd like to eventually have a stand-alone app. No point in making a web app if people can just like on another tab. So I've picked what I'm most comfortable with in stand-alone apps: Microsoft stack with F#. I'm using Webkit as a browser and doing some persistence in a MS Access database for now, although that will probably change.
I think I'm pretty far along for just a solo effort. It pulls all the main articles from HackerNews, Digg, Reddit, and a couple more places. You can view the target article and vote them up or down, all without leaving the app. Of course, like any project, still a long ways to go.
Just up vote please. Replies are for adding to the conversation. If you are just going to agree, that is what the up vote is for.
Note: I do realize the irony of this post. I assume this is a new HNer and I hope to help educate him and all those who happen to read it, instead of just down voting him.
In terms of grabbing top comments quickly for articles that take my interest, it's unbeatable.
edit: if someone is interested, they should make a plugin that scrapes HN, to allow hovering over a HN item to see the top comment(s). (it can also scrape my site if it encounters a temp ban on HN -- although Javascript can scrape anyhow, so it could be done client side.)
-- in fact hovering or right-clicking over any Comments links around the web to reveal comments would be awesome instead of having to be forced to click through all the time, including in the rss reader. Also, bookmarking or somehow recording any particular useful comment would also be great. You could also use that bookmark data and similarly send it to a central site, to build up a new social news site based on comments. (it could end up looking like http://hackerbra.in/links and http://news.ycombinator.com/bestcomments). Headlines are linkbait now, stories are poorly written, but comments can and do have insight.
Another use would be in hovering over shortened links. OTOH, it could be something webmasters install. The Backtype API would be useful for this, but it is too limited at present (no url lookups.)
Am I supposed to reply to that? I chose hackerbra.in over hackerbrain.com (which I've also got) because after a while, you learn to ignore the dot. :)
Here's the logo: http://hackerbra.in/upcom4.png
-- no bra, no India (If India was concerned, they would've placed proof of business entity requirement, like with .com.au. And, big props to India for that wise decision.)
So many interesting topics, so much stuff to learn, so many smart people.
Actual 'use' of HN? I've found a number of people here that I would not hesitate to call friends, a much larger number of acquaintances and a few people that I work with, one on a day-to-day basis.
If I have a question that matters to me I don't hesitate to post asn "Ask HN", and for the most part they are answered in a way that is both enlightening and of a different caliber than what I'd get from other sources.
Usually the HN icon is what I click on in my bookmarks bar when I need to open a new tab in Chrome. So I end up glancing at the site a hundred or so times a day, but usually not for more than a few seconds at at time. I used to spend a decent amount of time on this site each day, but not very much anymore.
As I'm writing this comment, I notice that there are basically no stories at all on the front page that interest me. I like the stories that are more intellectually interesting, whereas everything on the front page is at best topical, although most of it is very derivative even for topical stuff. Right now I don't feel like there's a single story on the front page where I'd learn anything interesting or useful if I read it, and the gossipy article are too predictable for me to care.
I spend more time on the "new" page and the "comments" page than the top stories page. I sometimes check the most active or highest voted lists. I come here sporadically, sometimes not for days (or weeks) at a time and sometimes several times a day. Often, a good comment on the "comments" page leads me to find a very interesting discussion listed under an article whose headline wouldn't necessarily grab me. My bookmark is to my own comments ("threads" page) and I go there first and see if I need to reply to something someone has said to me. Then I look around for other stuff.
I like to look at HN and get some inspiration and keep my finger on the pulse of the startup scene.
But the truth is that if you spend more than a little time here each day, then it's no longer career research. It's just another form of procrastination that keeps you from getting stuff done. So enjoy HN, but don't overdo it.
Hi, I'm the creator of http://ihackernews.com. I believe the site works pretty well for the iPad, but I don't have access to one so I'm unable to verify it. Can you test it out and let me know what you think and if anything is broken? I'd love a screenshot if you can and I'll address any issues right away.
I check it at least five times a day, normally reviewing the comments. Favourite posts for me are requests for help, e.g. to review sites or ask a general question like this one, because you can generally learn something from people's experiences of various problems.
I enjoy reading HN so much that I ended up creating two sites[1][2] just to make reading it more accessible on my mobile phone.
I read HN first thing when I wake up, right before sleeping, and all through the day... often in little one or two minute bursts, saving links for items I want to read later. I start out on the home page, move to /ask then finally /new.
It's a great way to be motivated by reading about people who are creating amazing products. I find myself being pushed to do more when I see others talking about what they are creating.
A comments extractor would also be useful with VT (probably easier to do with sites with a comments and rss feed, but you couldn't get all comments nor their thread.) Also, getting multi page articles on the one page would be cool.
1) Usually once or twice a day. It's in my morning read and I read in the evening after work. When I'm at home I read HN on my TV through a Mac Mini. If I'm reading it at work over coffee first thing then I'll use my laptop.
2) If it's my morning read at work then I'll skim through the headlines on the main page looking for information security related stuff, and use instapaper for anything that looks like it's worth reading on the train home. Maybe 5 mins tops over coffee.
If I'm at home on the weekend I'll read the main page on my TV in the morning for about 20 minutes. In the evening I tend to read the main, ask and new pages for up to an hour.
Despite being an RSS and Twitter junkie, I nearly always visit HN directly (ditto for Reddit) and end up visiting nearly all of the front page items in the course of a day except those I know I won't find interesting from the title alone (right now, for example, the Django release news). I typically visit between 1 and 10 times a day. More if I'm involved in an ongoing discussion.
A few times a week I'll visit /new. This isn't enough but I find it too fast and furious, especially with showdead on. I'd be more likely to visit /new all the time if it only showed posts from users with >100 karma, say.
I check it in the morning, and in the afternoon if I'm bored with nothing else to do (otherwise, I'd be on it all day!).
I often stay around ten to twenty minutes on the site (as interludes to read the comments as I read the highest voted articles).
As a bonus, I'd say that I'm as green as grass on HN; I made my account yesterday after about a week of lurking. I think its signal-to-noise ratio is higher than other sites (I'm thinking of Proggit here) and the comments make for a genuine discussion.
Now using SmartPeople http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1584005 Site: http://nasr.ath.cx (it goes to one of my non perso or pro emails), I have selected to be alerted by what some of you are saying. It appears to be a very interesting way to discover the good links & discussions.
Result is that I am not checking HN every 10 min anymore in fear I miss some good stuff, I outsource this to the ones of you which taste/judgment I trust.
I use it to read Hacker News -- I leave it on the 'all' filter and scan the new items a couple times a day. The browser extension lets me see which comment threads I've read that have new comments, and then highlights those new comments for me. At the end of the day, I'll usually filter it down to the top 20 to see anything I might have missed.
HN is one of about 10 feeds that I have running through Yahoo Pipes and then into my Safari RSS bookmark, which shows a count of how many new interesting things I have to read. The pipe pulls a feed of articles that have more than 20 points (newsyc20) and then filters out any articles about zed shaw, lisp, clojure, haskell, etc. (Nothing against these things if you're into them, but I'm not.)
The bookmark RSS folder also contains my other aggregated, filtered feeds which include Twitter friends that don't talk too much, mentions, a highly-filtered list of affordable VPS deals, and a couple of good signal-to-noise blogs.
I'm subscribed to the RSS feed, and I click through the comments to each article I find interesting. If the comments are interesting, I'll click through to the article as well.
I've never submitted a link, but did a couple of "Ask HN" threads.
the search function (by google) is a little bit hidden (in the footer and not the top-right). yet is a door to a goldmine of wealth for people working on a startups.
pretty much every typical "startup question" has ben answered there in great detail.
besides the search i watch hn about twice a day. i actually started off with giles bowkett's mini app[1] (makes daily overviews of new-posts-of-the-day) in order to make reading hn less racey.. well, give that i now read hn straight from the source, i now accept that i rather have it a bit more racey :)
I check it every ~3-4 hours or so. Usually takes about 15 minutes.
I go through front page and look posts that are interesting to me. Then I go straight to the comments.
If the comments raise my interest in the actual article, I go read that.
On repeat visits, I tend to stick only to new stories, and stories where I saw an interesting conversation developing.
In big threads, I do a CTRL F for "minutes", "1 hour ago", "2 hours ago", "3 hours ago".(would make my life a lot easier, if pg had some way to highlight comments from a specific period...i.e. highlight every comment made within the last [3 hours][V] <---that's a drop down box)
Scan the whole frontpage once a day (takes about 30minutes) and then come back to check new submissions whenever procrastinating/taking a break. I scan the frontpage and occasionally older submissions, open tabs for submissions which seem interesting (and comment tabs for submissions which lead to discussion [claims/opinions/etc.]) and instapaper big articles for later reading.
I use Fivefilter's full-text rss(http://fivefilters.org/content-only/), which scrapes hacker new's rss and convert it in to full-text version. I can then read all articles right in my Google Reader. And I also jump to the actual post on HN to read the comments if I find the topic interesting.
I check HN for five minutes 0-5 times daily, open tabs that look relevant to my interest, and read as I have time.
I come to HN to look for articles that describe how to do things better/optimize tasks (generally that thing is/task relates to hacking/start-ups). I then think of the broader applications of these ideas.
I use hn like everyone else. The one unique thing I do is I load the frontpage and run my "hotness sort" bookmark which sorts articles by points plus comments per unit of time. Same for ask hn. I also view long posts in threaded mode to save scrolling.
1) once a day, for five minutes
2) http://news.ycombinator.com/news opening articles/topics in tabs, things which I find interesting I look at the comments and possibly comment myself.
I come here after I finish what is in my google reader. I then look at the top few pages for cool stuff, and read it. If there are lots of comments or I want to talk about what I read, I go to the comments.
I agree, though Reddit can come very close if you customize the Reddits you're subscribed to. If you want to get a high SNR, you can unsubscribe from "reddit.com", images, WTF, and things like that, and pick up programming, technology, math, and so on.
Because of this, I'm writing my own app for processing the web. A "browser for the easily engaged". It pulls the articles from all the major tech sites, including ranking, then it pulls the target articles. It learns what I like and don't like by doing Bayesian filtering on the client-side. Sort of a meta meta tech news app.
After all, how would a hacker consume news, if not by hacking it?