Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

So it somehow linked that to your account, and they slipped up on showing it to you. I'm sure if they exported they'd find that they also have more calls.


>and they slipped up on showing it to you.

Why do you think this?

I for one am happy as hell that they are including this, and I don't think we should be implying it was a mistake or that it's wrong. If you want them to export all their data about you, they should export all their data about you, and it looks like they are.


> they should export all their data about you, and it looks like they are.

I don't think they are exporting all their data about us.

Because the calls were not between that person, they were between two other people, that's kind of personal information that should only have been exported to the parties involved? Privacy and all that good stuff.


>Because the calls were not between that person, they were between two other people

I think one of us is misunderstanding the tweet here.

I read it as these calls are between OP and OP's Partner's mother. Meaning OP is a first-party in all of the calls. OP may not have been the source of the data, but OP was involved in the data, so the data was revealed to OP when he exported all of it.


You are correct I missread that tidbit.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: