So only scientists can write articles about science (and only the specific area that they research)? Would you say that only politicians can write about politics?
You'd live in a pretty limited (and skewed) world of information if people could only write about personal experience.
Or are you arguing that the writer showed little knowledge of actual gorilla research? You didn't provide any argumentation to support this perspective.
> what right does she have
Could you elaborate on how you got from TL;DRs to freedom of press?
Hint: They doesn't believe that statement, they were using its ridiculousness to attack your point of "If you don't have time to read the article, why do you think you deserve attaining its essence?"
You'd live in a pretty limited (and skewed) world of information if people could only write about personal experience.
Or are you arguing that the writer showed little knowledge of actual gorilla research? You didn't provide any argumentation to support this perspective.
> what right does she have
Could you elaborate on how you got from TL;DRs to freedom of press?