>In this one particularly the victim walked out of the house and then was shot after he slipped up on one of the commands.
In what other first world country a person would just be shot if they merely "walked out of house" and "slipped up on one of the commands"? Even if they had a gun on them, unless they actually fired, they still might not be shot by one of the actually competent police forces -- they'd tried to talk them down first.
Then again, in what other first world country a person can be shot if they walk out of their car after they have been stopped by the police?
Heck, unless he has been messy with their wives and they just found out, nobody in a first world country would shoot an unarmed man sitting on the floor and BEGGING not to be shot:
In what other first world country a person would just be shot if they merely "walked out of house" and "slipped up on one of the commands"? Even if they had a gun on them, unless they actually fired, they still might not be shot by one of the actually competent police forces -- they'd tried to talk them down first.
Then again, in what other first world country a person can be shot if they walk out of their car after they have been stopped by the police?
Heck, unless he has been messy with their wives and they just found out, nobody in a first world country would shoot an unarmed man sitting on the floor and BEGGING not to be shot:
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/daniel-shav...
And it's the people that need better schooling?