> An airgapped internal network for this sort of thing would be an acceptable compromise for accessing something remotely.
Do you even listen to yourself? Do you understand the concept of "remote"?
>This reads like you think that people dying is acceptable risk to take.
Yes, clearly this is a ridiculous notion. No one ever signs up for things that carry a risk of death like driving, being a soldier, or getting shot into space.
Do you even listen to yourself? Do you understand the concept of "remote"?
>This reads like you think that people dying is acceptable risk to take.
Yes, clearly this is a ridiculous notion. No one ever signs up for things that carry a risk of death like driving, being a soldier, or getting shot into space.