I understand that. I picked that section of your argument to attack because I'm against targeting specific races or nationalities, but I'm not against enforcing our current laws against criminals. We should absolutely enforce our immigration laws. Just like we should enforce our laws governing medical privacy and such.

I disagree with "Mexican deportation" because it's targeting the wrong thing. Anyone subject to deportation should be deported, not just some specific race or nationality. If that's not what the country wants anymore, cool, that'll generate the support to overhaul the laws. Loosen residency and citizenship requirements. Get it so those people don't have to hide in the shadows.

This "sanctuary city/state" crap is just prolonging the pain. It's a net negative for the states and the country as a whole.

As a whole, I'm against giving the government more information than it already has. But your argument made assumptions that don't hold, through much of the country. It was like reading "Civil forfeiture is unjust and should be outlawed. We should be allowed to transport our life savings in cash cross-country. And also the money from that chop shop we run in our spare time."