> The company specifically outlined in its filing that a strong focus of its lobbying has been for immigration.
> In addition to immigration, Apple’s government filing indicates lobbying for climate change, patent reform, accessibility, health initiatives, diversity, and education.
I'm not complaining about the existence of lobbying per se, I'm pointing out that they have the resources to lobby for special treatment and that companies in general shape the law by paying to influence lawmakers. Please don't obfuscate the point this way.
> In addition to immigration, Apple’s government filing indicates lobbying for climate change, patent reform, accessibility, health initiatives, diversity, and education.
Right. And we're supposed to eat that up. Why didn't they add happiness, rainbows, and kittens to that list.
> The company specifically outlined in its filing that a strong focus of its lobbying has been for immigration.
> In addition to immigration, Apple’s government filing indicates lobbying for climate change, patent reform, accessibility, health initiatives, diversity, and education.
Seems like worthwhile lobbying to me.