I've often wondered what it would be like to work on Open Source projects and contribute to something like that, but I've never done it before. This post piqued my interest, so I read it and followed the links and read the comments and, in general, spent more than an hour on reading the discussion.
Which leads me to my question: is this normal, widespread behavior in Open Source? I'm honestly interested in answers, because, frankly, to me this looked like a boatload of politics. I get enough of that at work.
Is normal, widespread behavior for humans when we are not getting what we want I think!
One practice is to be more conscious of when we're not getting what we want and pay extra special attention to how we're reacting to others as a result.
Greg says he wants Canonical to contribute more to upstream.
Mark probably wanted Greg to not badmouth Canonical.
Now neither party are getting what they want so the question is can everyone pay enough attention to their reactions to avoid a full-blown civil war?
Which leads me to my question: is this normal, widespread behavior in Open Source? I'm honestly interested in answers, because, frankly, to me this looked like a boatload of politics. I get enough of that at work.