>Like most of the ICOs I've seen, it is flawed on basic principle and lacks a clear business model, and is ill-positioned for the future.
I thought the idea was extremely straightforward compared to almost every other ICO: you pay tokens to have files hosted for you, and you get paid tokens to host other people's files. Or are you saying that you think they won't manage to implement that?
I thought the idea was extremely straightforward compared to almost every other ICO: you pay tokens to have files hosted for you, and you get paid tokens to host other people's files. Or are you saying that you think they won't manage to implement that?