As I explained in another thread, this comment makes no sense if you view the interaction as being about two different behaviours: a welcome advance and an unwelcome advance.
It is an impossible argument to make it you assume that the other party has a right to make a choice about who continues to pursue them for whatever damn reason they please.
It is an impossible argument to make it you assume that the other party has a right to make a choice about who continues to pursue them for whatever damn reason they please.