Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Not only the insurance model, but the encouragement of health insurance as an employer benefit. It adds one more aspect of indirection to an already complex health system.


Almost any politician will tell you that taxing employer-sponsored health insurance is a "3rd rail".

Almost any economist will say this is one of the largest problems with US health care costs and employment mobility.


> Almost any politician will tell you that taxing employer-sponsored health insurance is a "3rd rail".

Every employer outside of the health insurance and drug industries should be furious at the price they pay to pay their employees health benefits. Besides having a distraction that operating businesses in other nations don't have, they're likely paying more than double than what they need to in this area to maintain competitiveness against other nations. It's even worse for startups.


The ACA should have relaxed employer requirements and pushed people to exchanges; instead, it increased employer requirements.

It also probably should have used subsidies instead of Medicaid expansion. Expensive, but a bunch of healthy people would have been good for the exchanges (Medicaid expansion almost by definition was for healthy working people).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: