Frankly, I've never seen that (try / catch / ignore exception) in any commercial codebase I've worked on, running into tens of millions of lines.
The worst I've seen is people logging the error message but not the exception itself (so losing the stack trace), or causing another exception to be thrown (and losing the stack trace or cause of the original).
The worst I've seen is people logging the error message but not the exception itself (so losing the stack trace), or causing another exception to be thrown (and losing the stack trace or cause of the original).